Most denials are decided in the first 72 hours
Clarity Health Innovations surfaces documentation defensibility gaps early in hospitalization—before coding, billing, or payer review.
Documentation defensibility measures whether an inpatient admission can withstand payer review based solely on contemporaneous documentation—not retrospective interpretation.
Why Early Documentation Matters
In the first 72 hours, the chart establishes medical necessity, acuity, and clinical linkage across notes. If those elements are unclear or conflicting, the record becomes difficult to defend later—especially after discharge.
By Day 4+, risk is largely locked. After discharge, it's argued.
Built by a Practicing Physician
This system was designed the way physicians actually document—not the way dashboards wish they did. Founded by Dr. Alfredo Lee Chang, a practicing pulmonologist and critical care physician.
How Clarity Works
- Early admission documentation is ingested
- Deterministic rules evaluate documentation defensibility signals
- Only high-confidence, evidence-supported gaps are surfaced
- CDI/UM/physician advisor reviews and decides if clarification is warranted
- No output indicates no high-confidence documentation defensibility risk signals
What Clarity Does NOT Do
- Does not auto-code claims
- Does not assign diagnoses
- Does not replace CDI judgment
- Does not act as a black-box decision engine
- Does not guarantee denial avoidance
Clinical decisions remain with the treating team. Clarity highlights documentation clarity opportunities supported by the record.
Built for Teams Accountable to Audits
Target users: CDI leadership, Utilization Management, Physician Advisors, Denials and Appeals teams, Compliance, Revenue Integrity
If you're judged by audits, denials, and appeals — Clarity fits.
If you're judged by preventing problems before discharge — Clarity fits better.